Public policies are often prompted by the need to respond to particular problems in the policy
environment, i.e., to critical ecological or social conditions. Policies frequently take years to
develop and implement, but changing conditions can mean that they are quickly outdated. Poor
monitoring of the policy environment and resistance to change among policy stakeholders make
policies rigid and poorly adapted to ecological conditions in the long term. Designing policies that
lend themselves to long-term performance measurement rather than short-term problem solving,
and involving citizen groups in environmental monitoring and reporting can help increase the
robustness and flexibility of public policies.
Policies may also reflect outdated assumptions about urban and ecological systems. Urban
subsystems based on linear processes (in food supply, waste management, transportation,
sewerage and water infrastructure ) assume the cheap availability of energy and materials, rich
public treasuries, and the infinite capacity of the ecological sinks which must handle our pollution.
We are learning how to design more materials-efficient and cost-effective circular urban processes
from observing ecological systems in nature and from initiatives in developing world communities.
Finally, many jurisdictions do not have anything approaching an "urban policy" largely because
political structures have been created to suit our rural past. Thus, national and sub-national or
regional governments have no vision of desirable urban futures, and no integrated policies to
address problems unique to urban development and the protection of urban environments. This
section will include articles on movements and initiatives that strengthen the recognition of the need
for an integrated urban policy.
Please check our articles in the following areas:
